The Unfinished · IFA Partner Programme
Your clients deserve an independent
evaluation. Now you can offer one.

The institutional-grade wealth evaluation capability that private banks have always had — independently verified, delivered under your brand, without building it yourself.

For IFAs & Independent Advisors

Institutional-grade
evaluation.
Your brand. Your clients.

The evaluation capability that private banks and family offices have always had — AI-powered, independently verified, delivered under your name. Give your clients a quality of analysis they have never seen before. Without building it yourself.

Request a Demo Evaluation
See How It Works →
55-factor framework AI-powered · Human-verified Your brand on every output ₹25,000 / year
CAS_PARSER · LIVE
›parse_cas("Ketan_Gupta_CAS.pdf")
Reading CAMS + KFintech consolidated statement...
Why Partner With The Unfinished

What changes for your practice
from Day 1.

🏛
Institutional depth. No institutional cost.
The evaluation capability that Kotak Private Banking and Julius Baer use internally — now available to your practice. Without the team, the tech investment, or the conflict of interest.
Advisor Tip
"When a client asks why they need this: 'The analysis that Kotak Private Banking does for their ₹50 Crore clients — this is what we're now able to do for you. The difference is I commissioned it. They didn't.'"
🏷
Your name on every output.
Every Layer 1 diagnostic and Layer 2 client summary carries your branding. Your client sees your practice, your name. The Unfinished works behind the scenes.
Advisor Tip
"Introduce the evaluation before sharing the report: 'I commissioned an independent review of your portfolio. The report carries my name — because I stand behind the findings and what we do with them.'"
🔒
Zero conflict. Full trust.
The Unfinished holds no distribution license. Earns zero commissions. Has no products to sell. The evaluation is structurally independent — which makes you structurally trustworthy.
Advisor Tip
"If a client is skeptical about the evaluation: 'The people who did this analysis have no product to sell you, no commission from any fund, and no relationship with any AMC. Their only incentive is accuracy. That's why I chose them.'"
⚡
48-hour turnaround.
Upload client data. Our AI pipeline parses, enriches, and evaluates across all 55 factors. Human analyst verifies every finding. Report delivered in 48 hours. Under 30 minutes of your time per client cycle.
Advisor Tip
"Set the expectation at intake: '48 hours from when we receive the documents. I'll review the full report personally before anything reaches you — nothing lands in your inbox without my sign-off first.'"
🔌
Portal upload or API.
Send clients a secure one-time upload link. Or if you already have structured data, connect via REST API with webhook callbacks. Evaluations at scale — no manual data entry.
Advisor Tip
"Reassure data-hesitant clients: 'The documents go through a secure encrypted link — same standard as your bank's internet banking. They're used only for this evaluation and deleted from the system afterward.'"
📊
Six communication assets per client.
WhatsApp message, client email, 1-page briefing PDF, meeting agenda, action summary card, quarterly update note — all generated automatically. Ready to send in minutes.
Advisor Tip
"Send the WhatsApp teaser within 2 hours of the meeting while it is still fresh — two specific findings, the overall grade, and 'happy to walk you through it.' Clients who read the teaser first arrive at the review call already engaged."
The Architecture

Two layers. Same data.
Two different conversations.

Every evaluation produces two outputs — one for you, one for your client. You review the full picture privately first. Then you deliver the client summary in your voice, through whichever channel works for your relationship.

LAYER 1 — ADVISOR ONLY
Full Diagnostic
Complete 55-factor findings — every grade, every observation, including findings that require a difficult conversation.
Advisor Tip
"Read Layer 1 alone first — before the meeting, before sharing anything. Mark the 2–3 findings you'll lead with and the ones that need careful framing. The sequence matters as much as the content."
Advisor accountability data — benchmark drift, churn signals, overlap patterns. Data, not accusation.
Advisor Tip
"Treat the accountability section as preparation, not judgment. If there's a pattern worth explaining, the Layer 1 talking points give you the exact language to address it before the client raises it."
Talking points for each finding — tested language to present findings constructively. You walk in prepared.
Advisor Tip
"Personalise the opening line for each client. The templates are tested and effective — but delivery should sound like you, not like a script. One sentence of customisation makes the whole meeting feel different."
Prioritised action register — what to fix, in what order, with estimated impact. You decide what to lead with.
Advisor Tip
"Don't present all 8 actions at once. Choose 3 to lead with: the highest-impact item, the easiest quick win, and one that shows the analytical depth of the evaluation. The client feels momentum without being overwhelmed."
⚠ NOT FOR CLIENT DISTRIBUTION
LAYER 2 — CLIENT FACING
Your Client's Forward Plan
Same factual data as Layer 1 — grades, percentages, fund names. Locked. Cannot be edited.
Advisor Tip
"Walk the client through Layer 2 together in the meeting — don't send it in advance. The conversation around each finding is where the value is created. A report read alone is information. A report discussed together is trust."
Framing shifts to forward — not "what went wrong" but "what we are fixing together." Same facts, constructive direction.
Advisor Tip
"Open every finding with the positive first: 'Your cost discipline is exceptional — let's make sure the structure matches that discipline.' Same data. The client's receptivity to what follows changes completely."
Evaluation credibility section — explains independent evaluation to the client. Positions you as the advisor who commissioned it.
Advisor Tip
"Point to this section explicitly: 'See this part — it explains who did this evaluation and why they have no stake in what you decide next. I chose them specifically because they have nothing to sell you.'"
Action register in client language — what to do, by when, and expected benefit. Client leaves with a clear plan.
Advisor Tip
"Close every meeting with: 'Which of these three would you like us to start with?' Giving the client the choice of first action creates ownership. They remember it as their decision, not your recommendation."
✓ DATA LOCKED · YOUR BRAND · YOUR VOICE
The data lock: All grades, percentages, and fund names in Layer 2 are pulled directly from the evaluation engine — they cannot be edited. Your client also has independent access to the original full report via The Unfinished's portal. This creates a trust backstop that keeps the process honest for everyone.
How It Works

From client conversation
to delivered report — 6 steps.

1 · INTAKE
2 · DATA & API
3 · AI ENGINE
4 · LAYER 1
5 · LAYER 2
6 · TOOLKIT
STEP 1 OF 6
Client Intake &
Scope Definition
You lead this conversation with your client using our intake form and scope framework. ~15 minutes. You run it your way.
~15 minutes · Your conversation · Your style
What happens at intake:
1
Define scope
MF only, or all 8 asset categories. Fixed at intake and signed off.
2
Set context
Retirement horizon, goals, risk appetite, known concerns. Grounds the evaluation in the client's life.
✓
Data consent signed
Clear consent form before any document is shared. Client knows exactly what's being analysed.
Next: Data & API →
STEP 2 OF 6
Data Ingestion —
Portal or API
Client uploads via secure portal link — or you push structured data via REST API. Our parser handles the rest automatically.
Encrypted · Auto-parsed · 48h to delivery
PORTAL UPLOAD
⬆
One-time secure link to client
Client attaches CAS, demat, insurance statements. Auto-parsed on receipt.
PDF · XLS · CSV · AES-256 encrypted
API INTEGRATION
⚡
Connect your existing platform
Push structured data from your CRM. Trigger evaluations programmatically at scale.
REST API · JSON · Webhook callbacks
PARSED OUTPUT · STRUCTURED JSON
{
"client": "Ketan Gupta",
"folios": 16,
"transactions": 847,
"aum_inr": 7380000,
"direct_plans": 100,
"overlap_flags": ["HDFC Bank", "Reliance", +3]
}
← BackNext: AI Engine →
STEP 3 OF 6
AI Engine Runs —
So You Don't Have To
55-factor evaluation runs automatically. Live data enrichment. Human analyst verifies every finding before delivery.
AI-powered · Human-verified · 48 hours
The 5-stage evaluation pipeline:
📥
INGEST
CAS parsed via portal or API
›
🔍
ENRICH
Live NAV, benchmark, peer data
›
⚙️
SCORE
55 factors graded A–D
›
👁
VERIFY
Senior analyst reviews all findings
›
📤
DELIVER
Layer 1 to you first
Tap any category to see what's evaluated inside:
Cost Architecture8 factors
▼
Portfolio Structure7 factors
▼
Overlap & Redundancy5 factors
▼
Advisor Quality★ Human8 factors
▼
Risk Calibration7 factors
▼
Goal Alignment8 factors
▼
Insurance & Protection★ Human7 factors
▼
Estate & Legal★ Human5 factors
▼
★ Human — requires analyst judgment, not just data processing
← BackNext: Layer 1 →
STEP 4 OF 6 · ADVISOR ONLY
Layer 1 —
Your Full Diagnostic
You receive the complete, unfiltered evaluation first. Private to you. Review, prepare your position, decide how to sequence the conversation.
⚠ Not for client distribution
What Layer 1 contains — for your eyes only:
Complete 55-factor findings
Every factor graded. Every observation documented. Including findings that implicate past decisions — framed as data, not accusation.
Advisor Tip
"Block 30 minutes alone with Layer 1 before you meet the client. Findings that surprise you in the meeting will show on your face. Findings you've already processed — you can present with calm confidence."
Advisor accountability observations
Churn signals, benchmark drift, overlap patterns. Written to help you prepare responses, not to create conflict.
Advisor Tip
"If the accountability section surfaces something uncomfortable, address it first — before the client brings it up. 'One thing I noticed in the data — I want to explain how we got here and what we're doing about it.' Proactive honesty is the most powerful trust signal you have."
💡 Talking points for each finding
Suggested framing for the client conversation — tested language that presents findings constructively.
Advisor Tip
"The talking points in Layer 1 are tested across multiple client types — but the best version is always when you make it specific to this client. 'With everything you've told me about your retirement timeline' lands better than a generic opener every time."
Prioritised action register with sequencing
What to fix, in what order, with estimated client impact. You decide which actions to lead with.
Advisor Tip
"Pick your lead action before the meeting. The one with the clearest data behind it and the fastest visible result. 'We can fix this today — the impact shows up in your next statement' is worth more than five complex recommendations that take a year to materialise."
← BackNext: Layer 2 →
STEP 5 OF 6 · CLIENT FACING
Layer 2 —
Your Client's Forward Plan
Same factual data as Layer 1 — locked, immutable. Framing shifts entirely. Not what went wrong. What we are fixing together.
Data locked · Your name on it · Your voice
What Layer 2 contains — and what makes it different:
Factual findings — forward framed
Same grades and numbers as Layer 1. Language reframed: "Your cost discipline is exceptional" and "Here is what we are streamlining" — same facts, constructive direction.
Advisor Tip
"Don't email Layer 2 in advance — present it together. The discussion around each finding is where trust is built. A report read alone is just information. The same report explained by you in real time becomes a demonstration of your expertise."
Evaluation credibility section
Explains independent evaluation to the client — 55 factors, zero commissions, no distribution license. Positions you as the advisor who commissioned this.
Advisor Tip
"Point to this section and read one line aloud: 'The Unfinished holds no distribution license and earns zero commissions.' Then say: 'I chose them because that's the only party whose findings I could put my name next to without any conflict.'"
Action register — client language
What to do, by when, and the expected benefit. Written for a non-specialist. Client leaves with a clear, prioritised plan.
Advisor Tip
"End the meeting with this exact question: 'Which of these three would you like us to start with?' The client choosing the first action creates ownership and commitment. It becomes their decision, not your recommendation — which means they'll follow through."
The data lock: All grades and fund names are pulled directly from the evaluation engine — cannot be edited. Your client also has independent access to verify. This keeps the process honest for everyone.
Advisor Tip
"If a client asks why the numbers can't be adjusted: 'They come directly from the evaluation engine — I can't edit them, and neither can anyone else. That's precisely what makes this worth commissioning. The independence is structural, not just a promise.'"
Before the Toolkit
See the full Layer 1 report your clients will never see — and you review first.
View Sample →
← BackView Layer 1 Report · Then Toolkit →
STEP 6 OF 6
Multi-Modal
Communication Toolkit
Six communication assets — auto-generated the moment the evaluation is complete. Ready to use. Under 30 minutes per client cycle.
Findings locked · Your voice · Your brand
Six assets — one for every channel:
WHATSAPP
150 words. One finding, one implication, one CTA. Sent Monday, meeting booked by Wednesday.
CLIENT EMAIL
300–500 words. Personalised intro, 3 key findings as opportunities, call to action for a meeting.
1-PAGE PDF
Top 5 findings, grade, 3 priority actions. Sent before the review meeting so the client arrives prepared.
MEETING AGENDA
Findings ranked by priority with suggested talking points. You walk in prepared, never scrambling.
ACTION CARD
Prioritised actions with timelines and expected impact. Client takes this away as a record of commitment.
QUARTERLY UPDATE
Drift, new flags, completed actions since last evaluation. Keeps engagement alive between annual cycles.
<30
Minutes per client cycle. 15 clients = 60–90 hours saved annually. No additional headcount.
← BackSee Pricing →
Your Structural Advantage

The independent advisor's edge
has always been trust.
Now it also has evidence.

Large banks and wealth platforms have scale. What you have is something they structurally cannot offer — a relationship built on the client's interest, not a product target. The Unfinished gives that relationship a rigour that no institution can match on your behalf.

🎯
You know your client. We know their portfolio.
No institutional advisor has the relationship context you carry. The Unfinished adds structured portfolio intelligence to that relationship — so your conversations are both personal and evidence-backed.
⚖️
Objectivity they can't get anywhere else.
Your client's bank RM earns from what they sell. Their app earns from what they recommend. You earn from their trust. An independent evaluation — commissioned by you — proves that difference structurally, not just verbally.
🔒
Accountability without conflict.
When the evaluation confirms your portfolio decisions, your client sees validation from an independent source — not just from you. When it surfaces issues, you address them before they become a reason to leave.
What institutional advisors can't offer your clients
✗
An evaluation with zero commission interest in the outcome
✗
A diagnostic that includes insurance, estate, and goal alignment — not just portfolio returns
✗
A second opinion that isn't trying to move the client to a different product
✗
A report that names the underperforming fund without trying to replace it with a house product
What you can now offer — that they cannot
✓
A 55-factor independent evaluation commissioned in the client's interest alone
✓
Full portfolio visibility — every asset class, every cost layer, every structural risk
✓
Findings delivered under your brand — reinforcing your position as the trusted principal
✓
An annual evaluation rhythm that turns every client review into a moment of demonstrated value
55
Evaluation factors — cost, risk, advisor quality, insurance, estate, goals
₹0
Commissions earned. Zero AMC relationships. Structurally conflict-free.
48h
Delivery from data receipt — anywhere in India, any portfolio size
<30
Minutes of your time per client evaluation cycle, start to finish
Pricing

Try it first.
Scale when you're convinced.

Start with a free evaluation — no card, no commitment. Every paid tier includes the full two-layer architecture, communication toolkit, and 48-hour delivery. Pay per evaluation, subscribe to a practice plan, or go unlimited. Your pace.

Free to start
One full evaluation. Free. No card required.
Complete Layer 1 + Layer 2 + all 6 toolkit assets — on one of your clients. See the output before you decide anything. This is how every partnership should start.
Claim Your Free Evaluation →
No card · No commitment · Full output
PAY PER EVALUATION
Pilot
₹3,500
per evaluation · no subscription
Best for: IFAs exploring the product or with fewer than 5 HNI clients annually.
Full 55-factor evaluation
Layer 1 + Layer 2 delivered
All 6 communication assets
48-hour turnaround
Your brand on every output
No minimum. Stop anytime.
Start a Pilot →
ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION
Practice
₹18,000
per year · includes 12 evaluations
Best for: Established IFAs with 10–30 HNI clients and a regular annual review cycle.
12 evaluations included per year
₹1,800 per evaluation beyond 12
Layer 1 + Layer 2 + full toolkit
Priority 48-hour turnaround
Quarterly monitoring alerts
Portal upload + API access
Effective rate
₹1,500/evaluation at 12 · 57% less than Pilot pricing
Subscribe Now →
UNLIMITED
Scale
₹45,000
per year · unlimited evaluations
Best for: Large RIA practices or IFAs with 30+ active HNI clients.
Unlimited evaluations
Layer 1 + Layer 2 + full toolkit
Priority turnaround
Full API integration + webhooks
Quarterly monitoring — entire book
Dedicated onboarding support
Talk to Us →
Every tier includes
✓ Two-layer output (Layer 1 + Layer 2)
✓ 6 auto-generated communication assets
✓ 48-hour delivery
✓ Your brand on every output
✓ Advisor talking points with each report
✓ AES-256 encrypted data handling
Why Independence Matters For You

The evaluation is independent.
That makes you trustworthy.

The Unfinished holds no distribution license. Earns zero commissions. Has no products to sell. When you commission an independent evaluation for your client, you are the advisor who brought in a third party to verify your own work. That is a rare and powerful signal.

🚫
No Distribution License
We cannot sell any financial product to your client. Ever. Structurally — not aspirationally.
₹0
Zero Commissions
We earn nothing from AMCs, brokers, or insurers. Our only revenue is the subscription fee you pay.
🔒
Data Never Shared
Client data is used solely for the evaluation. Purged within 90 days of delivery. Never shared with any third party.
Take the First Step
Nominate one client.
We'll run the evaluation free.
Pick one of your clients with a mutual fund portfolio. We'll deliver a full evaluation — Layer 1 diagnostic and Layer 2 client summary — at no cost. See what the output looks like before you commit to anything.
Request a Free Demo Evaluation →
LAYER 1 · ADVISOR ONLY Sample Evaluation Report · Mr. Ketan Gupta
✕ Close
T H E   U N F I N I S H E D
Layer 1 — Full Diagnostic Report
Prepared For
Mr. Ketan Gupta
Report ID
TU-2026-KG-L1-001
Evaluation Date
April 2026
Portfolio AUM
₹73.8 Lakhs
Schemes Evaluated
16 MF Schemes
Your Reference
[IFA Name / Firm]
Overall Assessment
B
Overall Portfolio Grade: B
Strong cost discipline (A+) severely undermined by structural overlap, zero debt buffer, and one material underperformer. Three high-priority actions will materially improve portfolio quality within one annual cycle.
Advisor's Note: The core issue here is not fund selection quality — most individual schemes are solid. The issue is portfolio architecture. Five Large Cap funds buying the same stocks is a structural problem that your client may not have been aware of. This conversation, positioned correctly, builds significant trust.
Category Scorecard
8 Categories · 55 Factors Evaluated
CategoryGradeFactorsPrimary Finding
Cost ArchitectureExpense ratios, Direct/Regular, trail leakageA+8/8100% Direct plans. Zero trail commission. Genuinely exceptional cost discipline.
Portfolio StructureAllocation, equity-debt balance, driftD7/797% equity. ₹0 meaningful debt allocation. Single market event could trigger forced sale.
Overlap & RedundancyFund-fund overlap, MF-equity, sectorD5/55 Large Cap funds share 7 identical top-10 stocks. Paying 5 TERs for 1 position.
Fund QualityBenchmark performance, alpha, consistencyB8/8Majority strong performers. One material underperformer identified (Tata Large Cap — D grade).
Risk CalibrationVolatility, drawdown, liquidity mismatchC5/7Portfolio is high beta with no defensive buffer. Drawdown risk underappreciated given life stage.
Goal AlignmentCorpus mapping, SIP sustainabilityB4/8SIP discipline is strong. Full goal mapping requires retirement timeline and income data.
Insurance & ProtectionLife, health, critical illness adequacyNot EvaluatedInsurance policies not provided. Requires: all life and health policy documents.
Estate & LegalWill, nomination, successionNot EvaluatedEstate documents not provided. Requires: will status, nomination records.
Key Findings · Severity Flagged
What this portfolio reveals — unfiltered
HIGH
Tata Large Cap Fund — Material Underperformer
3-year returns: 74% vs portfolio average 189%. Consistently ranked bottom quartile in category. No recovery signal in the last 8 quarters. This fund should not be in any portfolio.
Estimated drag vs category average: ~₹3.8L over 3 years on current holding.
Advisor Tip
"Lead with the data, not the opinion: 'The numbers on this fund are clear — 74% over 3 years vs 189% for the rest of the portfolio. That's not bad luck, that's a pattern. The decision to exit is the data's, not mine.' The client can't argue with the comparison — only agree."
HIGH
5 Large Cap Funds — 73% Stock Overlap Across All Five
HDFC Bank, Reliance, Infosys, ICICI Bank, and TCS appear in all 5 funds simultaneously. The client believes they are diversified. They are not. They hold 1 Large Cap position purchased 5 times, with 5 separate annual fees.
Redundant TER cost: ₹18,200–22,400/yr. Consolidating to 2 funds resolves immediately.
Advisor Tip
"Show the overlap table before explaining it. Let the client count the ticks — HDFC Bank appears in all 5, Reliance in all 5. Ask: 'What do you notice?' Most clients say 'they're all the same' themselves. When the client arrives at the finding, the conversation is already halfway done."
HIGH
97% Equity — Zero Effective Debt Buffer
₹71.5L of ₹73.8L is in equity. The ICICI Pru Short Term fund (nominally debt) is being systematically depleted by regular withdrawals. A 25% market correction — not unusual — would erase ₹18L with no buffer to absorb it.
Target allocation: 15–20% in debt (₹11–15L). This requires deliberate rebalancing over 12 months.
Advisor Tip
"Frame it as protection, not pessimism: 'A debt buffer isn't a bet that markets will fall — it's what lets you stay fully invested in equity when they do. Without it, a bad quarter forces you to sell equity at the wrong time. With it, you hold.' The client who fears missing equity upside responds much better to this framing."
MED
ICICI Pru Short Term — Being Depleted by Withdrawals
Regular redemptions from the only debt fund in the portfolio. Counterproductive: the client is removing their only buffer while remaining 97% exposed to equity markets.
Redirect withdrawals to HDFC Liquid Fund. Halt ICICI Pru Short Term redemptions immediately.
Advisor Tip
"This is a simple fix with an immediate visible impact — use it as your quick win. 'We can solve this today. We redirect the withdrawal source from this fund to the liquid fund — one instruction, done. Your debt buffer stops shrinking from today.' Clients remember the quick wins. It builds trust for the harder conversations."
MED
Small Cap Underrepresented at 1.4%
At a ₹73.8L portfolio size, 1.4% in small cap (₹1.03L) is structurally under-indexed for a long-horizon equity investor. The return differential between Small Cap and Large Cap over 10-year rolling periods is significant.
Target: 5–8% small cap. Build via SIP in DSP Small Cap over 12–18 months.
Advisor Tip
"Introduce this as an opportunity, not a gap: 'Your core portfolio is solid. This is about adding a growth layer that the current structure is missing — not replacing what's working.' Anchor the SIP amount to what's being freed up from the Large Cap consolidation. It feels like redeployment, not fresh risk."
GOOD
100% Direct Plans — Exceptional Cost Discipline
Every single scheme across 16 funds is in Direct plan. This is rare. The TER savings vs Regular plan equivalent: approximately ₹1.1L per annum. Over 10 years at current portfolio growth, this represents a compounded saving of ₹18–22L.
Advisor Tip
"Always open with this — before any criticism. 'The first thing this evaluation confirmed: your cost approach is exceptional. ₹1.1L saved every year vs Regular plans. Over 10 years, compounded, that's ₹18–22L staying in your portfolio instead of going as trail.' The client who hears this first is far more receptive to the harder findings that follow."
GOOD
Parag Parikh Flexi Cap — Portfolio Star
Consistently outperforms category. Built-in international diversification (35% international allocation) provides a natural INR hedge. One of the few genuinely differentiated funds in the portfolio. Hold with conviction.
Advisor Tip
"Use this as proof of good judgment: 'This was a strong selection — it's differentiated, it performs, and it gives you international exposure your other funds don't. Not everything needs fixing. Part of this evaluation is confirming what to hold with conviction.' Clients need to hear that some of their choices were right — it makes them trust your recommendations on what to change."
Advisor Accountability · Layer 1 Exclusive
What the data says about advisory quality
This section is exclusive to Layer 1. It is not shared with the client. Use it to understand where advisory gaps exist and how to address them proactively in your next conversation.
NOTE
Tata Large Cap retention — no clear rationale
This fund has been consistently underperforming for 3+ years. Its continued presence in the portfolio cannot be explained by performance. If it was inherited from a previous advisor, a proactive exit now resets the relationship on the right footing.
Advisor Tip
"If this fund was added before your relationship began, say so: 'This one came in before I was managing this portfolio. The evaluation has now flagged it clearly, and we're acting on it. That's exactly why we do this.' Proactive ownership of inherited problems is one of the most powerful trust signals you can give a client."
NOTE
5 Large Cap funds — diversification narrative appears untested
The overlap analysis suggests these funds were added incrementally without cross-checking holdings. This is a pattern, not a one-off. The consolidation conversation is straightforward — and demonstrates rigour the client hasn't seen before.
Advisor Tip
"Turn this into a demonstration of your new rigour: 'This is exactly the kind of structural issue that doesn't show up in individual fund performance — only in a cross-portfolio evaluation. Now that we have this view, this is how we'll manage it going forward.' The finding becomes evidence of the value of the evaluation itself."
Before the meeting — questions to ask your client first
Ask: "When did you last review whether your funds are actually different from each other — not just different names?" Most clients have never been asked. The question itself signals a new level of rigour.
Ask: "If the market fell 30% tomorrow, which of your assets would you feel comfortable not touching for 3 years?" The answer tells you how they actually think about risk vs how they answered the questionnaire.
Ask: "Are there any funds in your portfolio that you're not sure why they're there?" This gives them permission to share doubts they've been holding. Makes the overlap finding land as a confirmation, not a surprise.
Opening the meeting — how to frame the evaluation
"Your cost discipline is genuinely exceptional — 100% Direct plans is something less than 5% of investors achieve. Let's build on that foundation."
"The overlap issue isn't a mistake — it's how most portfolios get built over time. Let me show you what you actually own versus what you thought you owned."
"This evaluation was done by a third party with no product to sell you. What they found is what the data says — not what I want you to do next."
"Before we go through the findings, I want you to know: there are two things that came out clearly positive. The challenges are fixable. The good discipline you've built is real."
Presenting the Tata Large Cap finding — tested language
"The Tata Large Cap fund has underperformed its category benchmark for 3 years consecutively. This isn't a temporary dip — it's a pattern. The data is clear on this one."
"Exiting this doesn't mean we made a mistake — sometimes funds lose their edge. What matters is catching it and acting. That's what this evaluation was designed to do."
If they push back: "I understand — you've held it a while and it feels like giving up on it. But the opportunity cost of waiting for it to recover is real. The evaluation gives us the data to make a clean decision."
If the client pushes back on findings
On overlap: "I hear you — you chose these funds at different times for different reasons. But look at this: HDFC Bank appears in all five. You're paying five separate fees to own the same company five times. The intention was diversification. The outcome wasn't."
On debt allocation: "97% equity isn't a problem when markets are rising. It's a problem when you need cash and markets are down 30%. The debt buffer isn't pessimism — it's the thing that lets you stay invested in equity longer."
On the evaluation itself: "This report was done by The Unfinished — they hold no distribution license, they earn no commissions, they have no products to sell you. The findings aren't coming from someone with a stake in what you decide."
When they say "but my portfolio has done well": "It has — and that's documented here as well. The question isn't whether it's worked. The question is whether it's structured correctly to keep working. These are different questions."
After the meeting — relationship builders
Follow up within 48 hours: "Thank you for the time yesterday. I've noted the three items we agreed to prioritise. I'll have the first action ready by [date] — wanted you to know we're moving immediately."
30 days later: "The overlap consolidation is done. The TER saving starts from this month — approximately ₹1,800/month. Small number. But that's compounding from today."
At annual review: "This time last year, here's what the evaluation found. Here's what we fixed, here's what has changed, and here's what the new evaluation shows. Let's compare."
When they refer someone: "The best way to explain what we did is to let them read the report. With your permission, I'd like to share an anonymised version — the structure of the findings is what resonates most with new clients."
Action Register
8 Actions · Prioritised by Impact
1
Exit Tata Large Cap — immediate
Redeem full position. Redeploy into Mirae Asset Large Cap. No LTCG implications if held less than 12 months. Check holding period before executing.
⚑ High PriorityEstimated gain vs continuing: ₹1.2–1.8L/yr
2
Consolidate 5 Large Cap funds → 2 maximum
Retain Mirae Asset Large Cap + Axis Bluechip. Exit Kotak Bluechip, ICICI Pru Bluechip after LTCG check. Eliminates ₹18–22K annual TER drag.
⚑ High PriorityTER saving: ₹18,200–22,400/yr
3
Build debt allocation to ₹11–15L (15–20% of portfolio)
Redirect proceeds from Large Cap consolidation into ICICI Pru Short Term + HDFC Short Term Debt. Target 12-month build. Stops portfolio from being a hostage to market timing.
⚑ High Priority12-month horizon
4
Halt withdrawals from ICICI Pru Short Term
Redirect any liquidity needs to HDFC Liquid Fund. Preserves the only fixed income position in the portfolio.
⚑ High Priority
5
Increase Small Cap from 1.4% → 5–8%
Add ₹2.5–3L via monthly SIP into DSP Small Cap or Nippon Small Cap over 12–18 months. Appropriate for a long-horizon equity investor at this portfolio size.
⚑ Medium Priority18-month SIP build
6
Review UTI Flexi Cap — evaluate vs Parag Parikh overlap
Both are Flexi Cap. PPFAS has materially outperformed and offers international exposure. UTI Flexi may be redundant post-consolidation review.
⚑ Medium Priority
7
Assess insurance adequacy — separate engagement
Insurance documents not provided. At ₹73.8L wealth level, insurance adequacy is a material question. Propose dedicated session.
⚑ Supplementary
8
Review SBI Magnum Gilt — duration risk check
Long-duration gilt funds carry significant NAV risk in rising rate environments. Confirm 5+ year holding intention or shift to shorter duration.
⚑ Low Priority
Auto-Generated · Locked to This Evaluation
Communication Toolkit — 6 Assets Ready
Generated from this evaluation the moment Layer 1 is verified. Data locked — same grades, same fund names. Your voice, your brand.
ALL 6 READY IN <30 MIN
WHATSAPP MESSAGE
To: Mr. Ketan Gupta
Dear Mr. Gupta,

Your evaluation report is ready. Two things worth opening it for:

→ 5 of your funds hold the same 7 stocks. See exact overlap on Page 4.
→ One fund scored D. The rest of your portfolio is strong.

Overall Grade: B

Happy to walk through it whenever convenient.
✉ CLIENT EMAIL
Subject:
Your Wealth Evaluation — Mr. Ketan Gupta — April 2026
Dear Mr. Gupta,

Please find your independent wealth evaluation attached. I've reviewed the full findings and have a few observations I'd like to walk you through at your convenience.

The short version: strong discipline in one area, structural improvements needed in two others. Worth 30 minutes together.

[Your name] · [Firm]
📋 MEETING AGENDA
Review session · Ketan Gupta · ~40 min
01
Cost Architecture (A+) — confirm your Direct plan approach and what it means in rupees over 10 years
02
Fund Overlap (D) — walk through the 5 Large Cap funds and the stock duplication table
03
Tata Large Cap exit — data, timing, redeployment decision
04
Debt buffer plan — target, timeline, which first action to start
📄 1-PAGE BRIEFING PDF
KETAN GUPTA · APRIL 2026
Portfolio Summary
OVERALL GRADE
B
AUM
₹73.8L
3 high-priority · 2 medium · 3 low · Full report attached
✅ ACTION SUMMARY CARD
Agreed actions · Ketan Gupta · April 2026
HIGH
Exit Tata Large Cap — by May 15
HIGH
Consolidate to 2 Large Cap funds — by Jun 30
MED
Begin debt buffer SIP — by May 01
+5 further actions in full report · Next check-in: July 2026
🔄 QUARTERLY UPDATE NOTE
Scheduled: July 2026 · Auto-generated from evaluation data
Dear Mr. Gupta,

Q1 update on your portfolio following the April 2026 evaluation.

✓ Completed: Tata Large Cap exited · Large Cap consolidated to 2 funds · TER saving confirmed

In progress: Debt buffer at ₹4.2L of ₹12L target · SIP running

No new flags this quarter. Full annual evaluation due: April 2027.
All 6 assets above are auto-generated from this evaluation's locked data the moment Layer 1 is verified. Grades, fund names, and action items cannot be edited. Your name and firm details are applied automatically.
READY IN <30 MIN →
Methodology
Data UsedNSDL Consolidated Account Statement (CAMS + KFintech). Holdings as on 28-Feb-2026. 16 folios, 847 transactions.
Grading BasisEach scheme graded vs category benchmark and peer quartile ranking over 1, 3, and 5-year periods where available.
Overlap AnalysisBased on published AMC portfolios per SEBI mandate. Large Cap funds: minimum 80% in top-100 stocks. Verified from Feb 2026 factsheets.
Evaluation Scope55-factor framework. 37 factors evaluated from CAS data. 18 factors require additional documents (insurance, estate, goals). Indicated above.
This report was conducted independently. The Unfinished holds no distribution license, accepts no commissions, and has no product to sell. This Layer 1 report is confidential and intended for advisor review only.
← Back to Step 5
You've reviewed Layer 1. Now see what the client receives.
Continue to Toolkit →